Johnson v. Sawyer,et al

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand for new trial due to an erroneous jury instruction is proper because the appellant had not properly challenged for sufficiency of the evidence
• holding that remand for new trial due to an erroneous jury instruction is proper because the appellant had not properly challenged for sufficiency of the evi dence
• noting that we have the power, on remand, to reassign a case to another judge
• noting disagreement with Sixth and Ninth Circuit and agreement with Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuit
• citing, in part, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (“[A] court of appellate jurisdiction may . . . require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances.”)
• citing, in part, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (“[A] court of appellate jurisdiction may . . . require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances.”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).