Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 723 S.E.2d 915
  • 290 Ga. 768
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1106
  • 2012 WL 1034435
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court correctly instructed the jury on OCGA § 16-3-21 (b) when the defendant killed the victim during a felony drug deal, even though defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense because the victim pulled a gun during the transaction
  • describing aggravated assault as an “inherently dangerous felony” that can support a felony murder conviction
  • explaining that “the ‘required evidence’ test only applies where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions” and that “[b]ecause the instant case does not involve two distinct statutory provisions, the ‘required evidence’ test does not apply”
  • describing aggravated assault as an “inherently dangerous felony” that can support a felony murder conviction
  • “For the reasons discussed above, if we are asked to overrule Heard, the request would require serious consideration.”
  • “For the reasons discussed above, if we are asked to overrule Heard, the request would require serious consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton, Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.