Skip to main content

Everett v. State

Citations

  • 899 S.E.2d 699
  • 318 Ga. 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]e are troubled by the inordinate and unexplained delay between the filing of Everett’s motion for new trial in 2010 and the filing of an amended motion 12 years later”
  • argument that the defendant “purported to enumerate as error” was abandoned under former Rule 22 where the defendant “failed to support this particular assertion with any argument or citation to legal authority”
  • “[S]tandard practice in Georgia has long required a party to make and obtain a ruling on an objection to evidence in the trial court, before or as the evidence is admitted, in order to preserve the objection for appeal.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.