Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 868 S.E.2d 226
  • 313 Ga. 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that process of “merger” implements the protections of “substantive double jeopardy law” against multiple punishments for the same offense
  • “Substantive double jeopardy law protects a defendant from multiple punishments when his crimes arise from the same conduct.”
  • “[s]ubstantive double jeopardy law protects a defendant from multiple punishments when his crimes arise from the same conduct.” (citing 4 There are other occasions where merger might not apply which are not applicable to this case. 10 OCGA § 16-1-7 (a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.