Tauch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury was entitled to consider a defendant’s flight from officers as evidence of his guilt
• concluding that the evidence was sufficient to convict of fleeing and attempting to elude where officers engaged in a “high-speed chase” in “clearly marked” patrol vehicles “with their emergency lights and sirens activated”
• upholding a defendant's convictions on two counts of attempting to elude a police officer based on a single police chase involving two police vehicles
• upholding a defendant’s convictions on two counts of attempting to elude a police officer based on a single police chase involving two police vehicles
• “The fact that a suspect flees the scene of a crime points to the question of guilt in a circumstantial manner. . . .”
• “the jury was authorized to consider [the defendant’s] flight from the scene and police as circumstantial evidence of his guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).