Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 498 A.2d 284
  • 64 Md. App. 625
  • 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that recusal was warranted where trial judge “took it upon himself, through his clerk, to unearth information about a case he was to try”
  • denial of due process where judge, through his law clerk, investigated allegations relating to defendant’s probation violation and relied on information gained by the investigation to revoke probation
  • denial of due process where judge, through his law clerk, investigated allegations relating to defendant's probation violation and relied on information gained by the investigation to revoke probation
  • judge directed law clerk to call defendant’s physician to determine if she was lying about the reason she missed a meeting with her agent
  • “ʻThe law requires the trial of a defendant not only to be fair but to give every appearance of being fair.’” (quoting Scott v. State, 289 Md. 647, 655 (1981))
  • “ʻThe law requires the trial of a defendant not only to be fair but to give every appearance of being fair.’” (quoting Scott v. State, 289 Md. 647, 655 (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Submitted Before Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.