Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/2/1965
Scott v. State
Citations
- 208 A.2d 575
- 238 Md. 265
- 1965 Md. LEXIS 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting probation permits a defendant to retain his or her freedom so long as the defendant conforms “with established communal standards and the safety of society”
- discussing probation as an agreement between the trial court and the defendant that results in the defendant obtaining his freedom as long as he conducts himself in a manner consistent with established communal standards and public safety
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Oppenheimer, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 117×
- Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-04· cited 115×
- Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-11-04· cited 93×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-16· cited 87×
- Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-25· cited 75×
- Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-03· cited 51×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-27· cited 51×
- State v. BrusenhanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-02-16· cited 49×
- Kaylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-04-26· cited 49×
- Stone v. SheaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-04-30· cited 48×
- Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-13· cited 46×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-03· cited 44×
- Harrison-Solomon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-03-30· cited 44×
- Holdren v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1969-03-24· cited 37×
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-10· cited 37×
- Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-10· cited 36×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 35×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 33×
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-22· cited 31×
- Hazell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-06-02· cited 30×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 523×
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1935-05-20· cited 515×
- Marshall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1960-10-10· cited 99×
- In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-01-22· cited 90×
- Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-16· cited 60×
- Manning v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1947-05-28· cited 59×
- Soliz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-11-01· cited 43×
- Edwardsen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-11· cited 41×
- Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1962-09-12· cited 39×
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-04-02· cited 39×
- Swan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-07-15· cited 35×
- Costello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-09· cited 34×
- Westchester West No. 2 Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-18· cited 28×
- Hite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-12-07· cited 23×
- People v. KudukAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-12-13· cited 21×
- Salvador Bernal-Zazueta v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1955-03-21· cited 20×
- In Re BrowningIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-22· cited 20×
- Jefferson Davis Broadus and Joe Curt Coleman v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-06-27· cited 14×
- Jett v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for MalesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-22· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.