Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/3/1983
Grant v. Zich
Citations
- 456 A.2d 75
- 53 Md. App. 610
- 1983 Md. App. LEXIS 231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in awarding alimony, the chancellor is not required to invoke expressly the wording of the statute to demonstrate that he considered the relevant factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lowe, Weant, Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holston v. HolstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-06· cited 68×
- Grant v. ZichCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-13· cited 65×
- Sharp v. SharpCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-09· cited 56×
- Bangs v. BangsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-06-07· cited 54×
- Coffman v. Coffman (In Re Coffman)D. Maryland· 1985-08-28· cited 49×
- Campolattaro v. CampolattaroCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-13· cited 43×
- Doser v. DoserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-07· cited 36×
- Dobbyn v. DobbynCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-02· cited 32×
- Malin v. MininbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-01· cited 27×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-07· cited 26×
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-30· cited 25×
- Nisos v. NisosCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-08· cited 24×
- Cotter v. CotterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-12· cited 23×
- Imagnu v. WodajoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-04· cited 21×
- Brewer v. BrewerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-03-31· cited 20×
- Joan G. HEAD, Appellant, v. Howard HEAD, AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1985-04-24· cited 17×
- Barr v. BarrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-13· cited 17×
- Mount v. MountCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-11· cited 16×
- Woodson v. SaldanaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-03· cited 14×
- Enviro-Gro Technologies v. BockelmannCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-05· cited 14×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 591×
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-08· cited 126×
- Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-23· cited 106×
- Brodak v. BrodakCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-21· cited 62×
- Ward v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-03· cited 47×
- Robert C. S. v. Barbara J. S.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-08-18· cited 42×
- Ohm v. OhmCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-15· cited 41×
- Bender v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-10· cited 28×
- Lapides v. LapidesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-04· cited 27×
- Jordan v. JordanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-07· cited 24×
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-17· cited 22×
- Winston v. WinstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-13· cited 17×
- Ayars v. AyarsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-11-04· cited 14×
- Teays v. Supreme Concrete Block, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-04· cited 9×
- Charles J. Cirelli & Sons, Inc. v. Harford County CouncilCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-02· cited 8×
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-11-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.