Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/10/1981
Dean v. State
Citations
- 434 A.2d 552
- 291 Md. 198
- 1981 Md. LEXIS 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that partially relying on a kidnapping conviction that had since been reversed to uphold a revocation of probation was error
- holding that if the trial court is reasonably satisfied that the probationer committed a crime, revocation is proper on the grounds that the probationer failed to “obey all laws”
- the Court refused to consider the State’s alternative argument, based on the petitioner’s failure to raise an issue at trial, because the State failed to file a cross-petition
- the Court refused to consider the State's alternative argument, based on the petitioner's failure to raise an issue at trial, because the State failed to file a cross-petition
- “[I]t is not necessary that a conviction precede a determination that the probationer has violated a condition of probation requiring him to obey all laws.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-12· cited 236×
- State v. AllewaltCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-25· cited 71×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-05· cited 64×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
- Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-03· cited 51×
- McAlear v. McAlearCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-01-19· cited 49×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-03· cited 44×
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-12· cited 38×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-07· cited 26×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-12-22· cited 26×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-14· cited 26×
- Frank v. StorerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-12-01· cited 21×
- Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-06· cited 20×
- Hammonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-03· cited 17×
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-24· cited 12×
- Horsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-15· cited 9×
- Wink v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-04· cited 8×
- Tinnen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-03· cited 8×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-17· cited 7×
- Baynard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-12· cited 6×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-09· cited 225×
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-03· cited 103×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-02· cited 88×
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-04· cited 86×
- Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-25· cited 75×
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 74×
- State Ex Rel. Roberts v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-01-24· cited 57×
- Edwardsen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-11· cited 41×
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-22· cited 31×
- People v. HannahAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-19· cited 20×
- Dean v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-08· cited 10×
- Jeweler v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-07-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.