Skip to main content

Dean v. State

Citations

  • 434 A.2d 552
  • 291 Md. 198
  • 1981 Md. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that partially relying on a kidnapping conviction that had since been reversed to uphold a revocation of probation was error
  • holding that if the trial court is reasonably satisfied that the probationer committed a crime, revocation is proper on the grounds that the probationer failed to “obey all laws”
  • the Court refused to consider the State’s alternative argument, based on the petitioner’s failure to raise an issue at trial, because the State failed to file a cross-petition
  • the Court refused to consider the State's alternative argument, based on the petitioner's failure to raise an issue at trial, because the State failed to file a cross-petition
  • “[I]t is not necessary that a conviction precede a determination that the probationer has violated a condition of probation requiring him to obey all laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.