Skip to main content

Gray v. State

Citations

  • 441 A.2d 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • individual’s consent to search certain items, including watch, remained valid even though consent was given 20 hours before items actually searched
  • individual's consent to search certain items, including watch, remained valid even though consent was given 20 hours before items actually searched
  • twenty hour delay while officers conducted other investigation permissible
  • consumption of alcohol by alcoholic not involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, Quillen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.