District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/17/2000
Smith v. State
Citations
- 753 So. 2d 713
- 2000 WL 283090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that search of defendant's mouth was not consensual and police officer did not have authority to command the defendant to lift his tongue
- finding that the State failed to meet its burden of proving defendant consented to warrantless search of his mouth
- characterizing officer’s statement “[d]o you mind lifting up your tongue” as “command” rather than request
- defendant cupped his tongue and did not respond to officer’s instructions to lift it
- discussing the consent exception to the warrant requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casanueva
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Golphin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-14· cited 58×
- E.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25· cited 30×
- Jonathan v. NallySupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-07-22· cited 20×
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-29· cited 17×
- Ingram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 13×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
- Lowery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-19· cited 9×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-05· cited 8×
- V.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-10· cited 7×
- State v. BeanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-22· cited 6×
- State v. WitherspoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24· cited 5×
- Alamo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-19· cited 4×
- Horne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-24· cited 4×
- Tyson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24· cited 3×
- State v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-12· cited 1×
- Clinton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-02· cited 1×
- VH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-10
- EB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25
- Haselier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-13
- State of Florida v. Evelyn BaroneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-11-08
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- United States v. Charles Scott WorleySixth Circuit· 1999-09-29· cited 191×
- Caso v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-04-07· cited 105×
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-06-24· cited 65×
- United States v. Joseph Edward PulvanoFifth Circuit· 1980-11-07· cited 64×
- United States v. Jose B. BuenoSixth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 62×
- John T. Tukes v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1990-09-07· cited 58×
- United States v. Fred Angelo Patacchia, Juliette v. ColomaNinth Circuit· 1979-08-13· cited 44×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-30· cited 43×
- Phuagnong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-15· cited 29×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-19· cited 26×
- State v. PooleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 17×
- State v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-19· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.