Phuagnong v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that on review of a motion to suppress, the appellate court is to give deference to a trial court's factual findings, but legal conclusions are reviewed de novo
• determining that by entering into a stipulation that a motion is dispositive, \the state waived its right to argue otherwise on appeal\
• relying on high court decisions in Miller and Ornelas to hold that “[t]he same reasoning supports independent appellate review where the validity of a search has been found to rest ... on consent”
• relying on high court decisions in Miller and Ornelas to hold that “[t]he same reasoning supports independent appellate review where the validity of a search has been found to rest . . . on consent”
• state's stipulation that ruling on suppression motion was dispositive constitutes a waiver of its right to argue otherwise on appeal
• “A positive response to a request to talk does not constitute consent to enter a citizen’s home.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).