State v. Bean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “pharmacists are expressly excluded from the definition of ‘health care practitioner,’ although they may be regulated as maintainers of records” under the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tamulonis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-09· cited 15×
• Hendley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-18· cited 11×
• Ruilova v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-28· cited 7×
• State v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-23· cited 1×
• State v. Albritton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herring v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
• Hudson v. Michigan
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
• Riggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-12-15· cited 59×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 46×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 22×
• State v. Carter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-30· cited 18×
• Gettel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-04· cited 11×
• State v. Fernandez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-22· cited 8×