District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/25/2004
E.B. v. State
Citations
- 866 So. 2d 200
- 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the record did not contain sufficient facts to suggest that the area where the juvenile was stopped was a high crime area
- observing that the record did not contain sufficient facts to suggest that the area where the juvenile was stopped was a high crime area
- holding search illegal because at the moment E.B. withdrew his consent by his nonverbal conduct, the officer did not have information sufficient to meet the probable cause requirement to further detain E.B.
- juvenile’s attempt to leave after he consented to pat down search constituted revocation of consent to search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casanueva, Silberman, Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-22· cited 21×
- State v. TrianaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19· cited 18×
- Rios v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-25· cited 10×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-28· cited 8×
- Bamberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 8×
- D.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-15· cited 8×
- Tarver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-27· cited 6×
- Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-13· cited 6×
- Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-19· cited 6×
- State v. WitherspoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24· cited 5×
- State v. LeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-08· cited 5×
- Bravo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-31· cited 4×
- Alamo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-19· cited 4×
- Maldonado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-26· cited 4×
- L.J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-20· cited 4×
- Hawley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-21· cited 3×
- Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-28· cited 3×
- Gay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-14· cited 3×
- R.A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-25· cited 3×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-03-02· cited 112×
- Doctor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-12· cited 99×
- Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-14· cited 22×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 22×
- Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 14×
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 13×
- Castillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-23· cited 13×
- Angaran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-28· cited 10×
- Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-27· cited 9×
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-21· cited 7×
- Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-09· cited 7×
- Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-06· cited 7×
- Harford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-13· cited 7×
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.