Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/14/1987
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 363 S.E.2d 404
- 294 S.C. 194
- 1987 S.C. App. LEXIS 433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the fact the wife had custody of the children since the parties separation alone supports the trial courts decision in this instance to place the children in the wifes custody
- holding the family court may accept one partys valuations of marital property over those of the other party
- holding the family court may accept one partys valuation of marital property over that of the other party
- the family court may accept one party’s valuation of marital property over those of the other party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Sanders, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-03· cited 120×
- David M. v. Margaret M.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-10-19· cited 76×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 73×
- Griffith v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 65×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 44×
- Pirri v. PirriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 44×
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 32×
- Arnal v. ArnalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-07· cited 29×
- Hickum v. HickumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 29×
- McDavid v. McDavidSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 27×
- Peirson v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-30· cited 20×
- Fields v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-21· cited 20×
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 18×
- Pruitt v. PruittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-08-04· cited 18×
- Sanders v. SandersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-21· cited 14×
- Nemeth v. NemethCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 12×
- Morehouse v. MorehouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-12-19· cited 9×
- Miles v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-29· cited 6×
- LaFrance v. LaFranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 6×
- Mick-Skaggs v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-05-14· cited 6×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ducote v. DucoteSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-11-08· cited 150×
- Hussey v. HusseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-01-23· cited 44×
- Shaluly v. ShalulySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-08· cited 33×
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-05-06· cited 27×
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-17· cited 21×
- O'Neill v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-07-20· cited 20×
- Rampey v. RampeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-11· cited 19×
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 17×
- Mann v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-02· cited 17×
- Hartley v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 17×
- Sauls v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-12-04· cited 17×
- Woodside v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-11-03· cited 17×
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-05· cited 16×
- Corley v. RoweCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 13×
- Barr v. BarrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-10-21· cited 13×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-12-31· cited 13×
- Berry v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-10-20· cited 11×
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-01-31· cited 9×
- Lawter v. LawterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 4×
- Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.