Skip to main content

Fields v. Fields

Citations

  • 536 S.E.2d 684
  • 342 S.C. 182
  • 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate court cannot reach issue where the appellant included issue in statement of issues on appeal but failed to argue issue in body of brief
  • noting an in-kind distribution is unwarranted when the nature of the parties’ relationship to the property would make it inequitable
  • deeming an issue abandoned where the appellant included the issue in the statement of issues on appeal but failed to argue the issue in the body of the brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shuler, Cureton, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.