Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/21/2000
Fields v. Fields
Citations
- 536 S.E.2d 684
- 342 S.C. 182
- 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that appellate court cannot reach issue where the appellant included issue in statement of issues on appeal but failed to argue issue in body of brief
- noting an in-kind distribution is unwarranted when the nature of the parties relationship to the property would make it inequitable
- deeming an issue abandoned where the appellant included the issue in the statement of issues on appeal but failed to argue the issue in the body of the brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shuler, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-11· cited 71×
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-12· cited 55×
- Burch v. BurchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-31· cited 20×
- Sanders v. SandersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-21· cited 14×
- Fuller v. FullerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-09-11· cited 12×
- Gardner v. Gardner Ex Rel. GardnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-03-13· cited 10×
- Hatfield Ex Rel. Hyman Law Firm v. Van EppsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 3×
- Mosley v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-11-10· cited 2×
- Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-11-28· cited 1×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-13
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 206×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-22· cited 116×
- Mallett v. MallettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 59×
- Skinner v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-03-05· cited 53×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-14· cited 48×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 44×
- McElveen v. McElveenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 39×
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 36×
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 32×
- McDavid v. McDavidSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 27×
- Hough v. HoughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 20×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-16· cited 15×
- Davis v. HammCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 9×
- Morehouse v. MorehouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-12-19· cited 9×
- Charest v. CharestCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-12-22· cited 7×
- Ducate v. DucateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-07-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.