Skip to main content

Pruitt v. Pruitt

Citations

  • 697 S.E.2d 702
  • 389 S.C. 250
  • 2010 S.C. App. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding husband was entitled to the reimbursement of alimony payments made after the wife's adulterous activity, but not to alimony payments made prior to the adultery
  • finding subsection 20-3-620(B)(13) \creates a rebuttable presumption that a debt of either spouse incurred prior to the beginning of marital litigation is a marital debt and must be factored in to the totality of the equitable apportionment\
  • \[A]n argument made in a reply brief cannot present an issue to the appellate court if it was not addressed in the initial brief.\ (alteration in original
  • \[A]n argument made in a reply brief cannot present an issue to the appellate court if it was not addressed in the initial brief.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Glasscock, Inc. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 348 S.C. 76, 81, 557 S.E.2d 689, 692 (Ct. App. 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geathers, Cureton, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.