Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/4/2010
Pruitt v. Pruitt
Citations
- 697 S.E.2d 702
- 389 S.C. 250
- 2010 S.C. App. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding husband was entitled to the reimbursement of alimony payments made after the wife's adulterous activity, but not to alimony payments made prior to the adultery
- finding subsection 20-3-620(B)(13) \creates a rebuttable presumption that a debt of either spouse incurred prior to the beginning of marital litigation is a marital debt and must be factored in to the totality of the equitable apportionment\
- \[A]n argument made in a reply brief cannot present an issue to the appellate court if it was not addressed in the initial brief.\ (alteration in original
- \[A]n argument made in a reply brief cannot present an issue to the appellate court if it was not addressed in the initial brief.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Glasscock, Inc. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 348 S.C. 76, 81, 557 S.E.2d 689, 692 (Ct. App. 2001))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geathers, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilburn v. WilburnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-12-04· cited 45×
- Fitzwater v. FitzwaterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 14×
- McMillan v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 7×
- Conits v. ConitsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-16· cited 3×
- Nestberg v. NestbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-31· cited 2×
- Thornton v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-10-02
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
- Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-03· cited 153×
- Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-14· cited 48×
- Hardy v. HardyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-04-15· cited 47×
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 46×
- Greene v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-08-05· cited 45×
- Nasser-Moghaddassi v. MoghaddassiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 37×
- Deidun v. DeidunCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-11-22· cited 31×
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-10· cited 27×
- Murray v. Murray Ex Rel. Estate of MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 25×
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-04· cited 20×
- Duckett v. PayneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-04-20· cited 20×
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 17×
- Dawkins v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-04· cited 17×
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-06-28· cited 16×
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 16×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-20· cited 14×
- Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-02-08· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.