Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/16/2010

Smith v. McKee

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 374
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5358
  • 2010 WL 909069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Substantial evidence is \`such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
  • \We must uphold the [Commissioner's] 1 Substantial evidence is \such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.\ Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB
  • Substantial evidence is \`such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
  • stating that courts may not render advisory opinions \ ‘to answer inquires that are merely speculative’ ” (quoting City of Fairfax v. Shanklin
  • concluding insufficient showing of ac‐ tual innocence where petitioner’s two new affidavits did not sufficiently counter the state’s evidence, which included two eyewitness identifications and a self‐inculpatory statement
  • explaining that IPI 3.15 pattern instruction included the “or” language between 1992 through 2001

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Smith v. McKee

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.