Fedell Caffey v. Kim Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the court analyzed the issues under state law rather than Chambers, its harmless-error analysis was essentially the same as the Chambers materiality inquiry.”
• no ineffective assistance in counsel’s failure to present admissible out-of-court statements of accomplices concerning how to clean fingerprints and powder burns, where the statements implicated the accomplices but did not exculpate petitioner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).