Paul Eichwedel v. Brad Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the State had waived a procedural default defense by deliberately choosing not to assert it
• access-to-court claim failed where prisoner did not identify “any nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim” he was prevented from bringing
• \The some evidence standard … is satisfied if there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.\
• “[t]he some evidence standard ... is satisfied if there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.”
• access-to-court claim failed where prisoner did not identify “any nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim” he was prevented from bringing
• access-to-court claim failed where prisoner did not identify “any nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim” he was prevented from bringing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).