Seventh Circuit· 5/24/2016
Eric Blackmon v. Tarry Williams
Citations
- 823 F.3d 1088
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9513
- 2016 WL 3007212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the standard “is demanding and permits federal court review only in the extraordinary case”
- holding that the standard “is demanding and permits federal court review only in the extraordinary case”
- explaining that the standard “is demanding and permits [federal court] review only in the extraordinary case”
- noting that a state court’s decision is entitled to deference, “so long as it is not objectively unreasonable”
- explaining that unreasonableness of counsel's failure to investigate was compounded by \significant potential benefits of obtaining alibi testimony from witnesses unimpaired by family ties to [the petitioner]\
- explaining that findings regarding the rate of error in eyewitness identification of strangers “have only limited application when multiple witnesses identify the same person.” (quoting Bartlett, 567 F.3d at 907)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton, Posner, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fontenot v. CrowTenth Circuit· 2021-07-13· cited 234×
- Arnold v. DittmannSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-24· cited 95×
- Triandus Tabb v. Tim ChristiansonSeventh Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 63×
- Jeremiah Felton v. Byran BartowSeventh Circuit· 2019-06-18· cited 46×
- Terez Cook v. Brian FosterSeventh Circuit· 2020-01-29· cited 30×
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-04· cited 27×
- Jerry Wilson v. Dan CromwellSeventh Circuit· 2023-01-23· cited 27×
- Winstead v. Lafayette County Board of County CommissionersN.D. Florida· 2016-06-20· cited 14×
- Michael Meyers v. David GomezSeventh Circuit· 2022-10-06· cited 14×
- James Freeman v. Guy PierceSeventh Circuit· 2017-12-27· cited 11×
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-12-30· cited 7×
- People v. QuickleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-03-25· cited 5×
- United States v. RedwoodN.D. Illinois· 2016-10-20· cited 1×
- Milton v. BoughtonSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-30· cited 1×
- Eric Blackmon v. Gregory JonesSeventh Circuit· 2025-03-20· cited 1×
- Skakel v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-05-16
- Richard Arnold v. Michael DittmannSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-24
- Olu Rhodes v. Michael DittmannSeventh Circuit· 2018-09-10
- Jerry Wilson v. Dan CromwellSeventh Circuit· 2023-06-01
- Arthur Grady v. Charles TruittSeventh Circuit· 2023-07-20
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 2013-05-28· cited 3,838×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- House v. BellSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 2,367×
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 1,891×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,205×
- James Perruquet v. Kenneth R. BrileySeventh Circuit· 2004-11-17· cited 441×
- Peter Lewis v. Jerry SternesSeventh Circuit· 2004-12-06· cited 420×
- People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 376×
- Trest v. CainSupreme Court· 1997-12-09· cited 363×
- Sharpe v. BellFourth Circuit· 2010-01-29· cited 227×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.