Seventh Circuit· 3/11/2014

Floyd Richardson v. Michael Lemke

Citations

745 F.3d 258
2014 WL 931112
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that federal courts cannot review the merits of habeas claims that were not fairly presented to the state courts or that were resolved on independent and adequate state-law grounds
holding that a federal habeas claim is “procedurally defaulted through a petitioner’s initial failure to preserve it with an objection, even if the petitioner later does attempt to present it for review”
holding that a federal habeas claim is “procedurally defaulted through a petitioner’s initial failure to preserve it with an objection, even if the petitioner later does attempt to present it for review”
holding that a federal habeas claim is “procedurally defaulted through a petitioner’s initial failure to preserve it with an objection, even if the petitioner later does attempt to present it for review”
mandating that petitioners “raise the issue at each and every level in the state court system, including levels at which review is discretionary.”
“engaging in an evidentiary due process analysis. . .by asking whether the probative value of the evidence is greatly outweighed by the prejudice to the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Bauer, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.