Smith v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying defendant union's motion for summary judgment because plain tiff employee presented evidence that plaintiff's coworkers (1) defaced calendar to mock plaintiff's single-mother status; (2) wrote that plaintiff \Blows\ in graffiti on elevator wall; (3
• “[Plaintiff] engaged in a protected activity when she turned to various levels of management with complaints regarding . . . sexual harassment.”
• similar standard applies in NJLAD cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).