Skip to main content
· 7/14/1993

Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.

Citations

  • 626 A.2d 445
  • 132 N.J. 587
  • 1993 N.J. LEXIS 712
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,016
  • 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the LAD’s purpose as “nothing less than the eradication of the cancer of discrimination.”
  • adopting section 219 of the Restatement as the framework for evaluating employer liability in hostile environment sexual harassment claims
  • setting forth elements of a hostile work environment claim under the NJLAD
  • holding employers strictly liable for equitable damages and relief
  • “When the harassing conduct is sexual or sexist in nature, the but for element will automatically be satisfied.”
  • enumerating standard for actionable hostile work environment sexual harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.