Heitzman v. Monmouth County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a disability discrimination claim because of the vagueness of the letter from plaintiff's doctor about the disability
• stating employers are liable for the harassment of co-workers only when the employer knew or should have known of the harassment
• characterizing \merely offensive\ comments as insufficient to sustain hostile work environment claim
• discussing plaintiff’s claim that he was subjected to hostile work environment because he was Jewish and noting that New Jersey courts have relied upon federal court decisions construing Title VII hostile work environment claims when reviewing such claims under LAD
• \[A] derogatory comment about another person generally does not have the same sting as an ethnic slur directed at a minority group member.\
• “[A] derogatory comment about another person generally does not have the same sting as an ethnic slur directed at a minority group member.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).