Skip to main content
· 10/23/1995

Romano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco

Citations

  • 665 A.2d 1139
  • 284 N.J. Super. 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that temporal proximity of employee conduct protected by CEPA and an adverse employment action is one circumstance that may support an inference of a causal connection
  • noting that prima facie case is the same under Title VII and the LAD but that New Jersey courts make the employer’s knowledge of the plaintiffs complaints an explicit element
  • finding causal connection of prima facie case under LAD, where employee was material witness in co-worker's sexual harassment suit against employer and was discharged shortly after his marriage to co-worker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Shebell, Stern and Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.