Skip to main content

Smiley v. State

Citations

  • 966 So. 2d 330
  • 2007 WL 1628111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that substantive change in self-defense law cannot apply to conduct occurring prior to the effective date of the amendment
  • holding that a statute establishing an affirmative defense “in a broad context that had not previously existed” is substantive
  • finding that statutory change in self-defense duty to retreat to be given prospective application under constitutional mandate
  • stating that procedural statutes “should be applied to pending cases in order to fully effectuate the legislation’s intended purpose”
  • “‘Repeal or amendment of a criminal statute shall not affect prosecution or punishment for any crime previously committed.’”
  • “Therefore, article X, section 9 of the Florida Constitution makes it constitutionally impermissible for section 776.013 to receive retroactive application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Smiley v. State

72 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.