State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 2014 version of section 775.082(1)(b)(1) applies retroactively \to all juvenile offenders whose sentences are unconstitutional under Miller\
• holding that resentencing pursuant to chapter 14-220 is the proper remedy for a sentence that violates Miller
• holding that resentencing pursuant to chapter 2014-220 is the proper remedy for a sentence that violates Miller
• concluding that “applying chapter 2014–220, Laws of Florida, to all juvenile offenders whose sentences are unconstitutional under Miller is the appropriate remedy”
• holding that the appropriate remedy for cases involving juvenile offenders whose sentences are unconstitutional under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012
• deciding that chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, should be applied to “all juvenile offenders whose sentences are unconstitutional under Miller [v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012)],” even though the statutes contain a prospective effective date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).