Skip to main content

Smiley v. State

Citations

  • 649 N.E.2d 697
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 464
  • 1995 WL 243681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a separation of witnesses order is meant to keep the testimony of one witness from influencing the testimony of another
  • no abuse of discretion where trial court excluded witness because testimony would have been cumulative and inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Robertson, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.