Skip to main content

Mederos v. State

Citations

  • 102 So. 3d 7
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13360
  • 2012 WL 3238759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a review of a trial court’s order on a motion claiming immunity under the [Stand Your Ground] statute is governed by the same standard which applies in an appeal from an order denying a motion to suppress”
  • affirming denial of Stand-Your-Ground immunity where the testimony below “contradict[ed] wildly” and the evidence showed that the defendant did not act in self-defense when he stabbed the victim
  • affirming denial of Stand Your Ground immunity where the testimony below “contradict[ed] wildly” and where there was competent substantial evidence that Mede-ros was not acting in self-defense when he stabbed the victim
  • “A writ of prohibition is the proper vehicle for challenging a trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss a charge on the ground of immunity from prosecution pursuant to the Stand Your Ground Law.”
  • “A writ of prohibition is the proper vehicle for challenging a trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss a charge on the ground of immunity from prosecution pursuant to the Stand Your Ground Law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Nortwick, Swanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mederos v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.