Skip to main content

Grice v. State

Citations

  • 967 So. 2d 957
  • 2007 WL 2890141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that law governing the order of closing arguments was procedural and applied at trial even if the crime was committed before the effective date of the law
  • describing a change as procedural “rather than of substance” because “[i]t does not relate to the elements of an offense or the punishment therefor” (emphasis added)
  • “Florida courts have repeatedly held that [article X, section 9] applies only to statutes that effect a substantive change in the law; it has no application to changes in the law that are merely procedural or remedial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.