District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/5/2007
Grice v. State
Citations
- 967 So. 2d 957
- 2007 WL 2890141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that law governing the order of closing arguments was procedural and applied at trial even if the crime was committed before the effective date of the law
- describing a change as procedural “rather than of substance” because “[i]t does not relate to the elements of an offense or the punishment therefor” (emphasis added)
- “Florida courts have repeatedly held that [article X, section 9] applies only to statutes that effect a substantive change in the law; it has no application to changes in the law that are merely procedural or remedial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY REININGERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 5×
- Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-05· cited 3×
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-12· cited 3×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-05· cited 3×
- Bruce Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-24· cited 3×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 1×
- Speer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-22
- Steverson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-04
- Woolf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-22
- TYMOTHY RAY MARTIN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-04
- Edward Lamont Hicks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-23
- Sledge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-13
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-11
- Haynes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-09
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 241×
- Arrow Air, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-17· cited 75×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-21· cited 74×
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. RichardelleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-08-29· cited 72×
- Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-09-03· cited 64×
- Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-06-07· cited 58×
- City of Orlando v. DesjardinsSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-11· cited 42×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 36×
- In Re Clarification of Florida Rules of Prac. & Pro.Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-31· cited 33×
- DIV. OF WORKERS'COMP, ETC. v. BrevdaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-08· cited 33×
- Birge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-20· cited 32×
- RAM OF SO. FL., INC. v. WCI Communities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 22×
- Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final ArgumentsSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-03· cited 18×
- Faulk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-07-25· cited 17×
- Wike v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 9×
- State v. SmileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-12· cited 8×
- Glover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-28· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.