Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[t]he presumption against retroactive application of a law that affects substantive rights ... is a well established rule of statutory construction\ that \comes into play in the absence of an express statement of legislative intent.\
• treating a statute with a remedial purpose as substantive because the clear effect was to affect substantive rights
• “The presumption against retroactive application of a law that affects substantive rights, liabilities, or duties is a well-established rule of statutory construction.”
• “[the Supreme Court of Florida] has never classified a statute that accomplishes a remedial purpose by creating substantive new rights or imposing new legal burdens as the type of ‘remedial’ legislation that should be presumptively applied in pending cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).