· 12/19/2006
Smalls, Eugene C. v. United States
Citations
- 471 F.3d 186
- 374 U.S. App. D.C. 63
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31130
- 2006 WL 3716596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The defense of res judicata, or claim preclusion, while having a ‘somewhat jurisdictional character,’ does not affect the subject matter jurisdiction of the district court.”
- consulting complaint’s prayer for relief to determine remedy sought
- discussing medical disability retirement benefits
- stating requirements for claim preclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.