Skip to main content
· 12/19/2006

Smalls, Eugene C. v. United States

Citations

  • 471 F.3d 186
  • 374 U.S. App. D.C. 63
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31130
  • 2006 WL 3716596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The defense of res judicata, or claim preclusion, while having a ‘somewhat jurisdictional character,’ does not affect the subject matter jurisdiction of the district court.”
  • consulting complaint’s prayer for relief to determine remedy sought
  • discussing medical disability retirement benefits
  • stating requirements for claim preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.