Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that malpractice claims stemming from services provided in bankruptcy proceedings fall within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court
• holding that malpractice claims stemming from services provided in bankruptcy proceedings fall within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court
• holding that malpractice claims stemming from services 15 provided in bankruptcy proceedings fall within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy 16 court
• holding that a fee application in bankruptcy court and a malpractice claim based on the same legal services arise out of the same nucleus of facts and satisfy the cause-of-action identity requirement of res judicata
• holding that a fee application in bankruptcy court and a' malpractice claim based on the same legal services arise out of the same nucleus of facts and satisfy the cause-of-action identity requirement of res judicata
• holding that a fee application in bankruptcy court and a 13 malpractice claim based on the same legal services arise out of the same nucleus of 14 facts and satisfy the cause-of-action identity requirement of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).