Skip to main content
· 11/2/2007

Greer v. Paulson

Citations

  • 505 F.3d 1306
  • 378 U.S. App. D.C. 295
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25553
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,046
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearsay inadmissible as evidence “counts for nothing” on summary judgment
  • noting that a plaintiff’s statements about another employee’s comment was “sheer hearsay” that “counts for nothing” on summary judgment
  • finding that “‘sheer hearsay . . . counts for nothing’ on summary judgment” (quoting Gleklen v. Democratic Cong. Campaign Comm., 199 F.3d 1365, 1369 (D.C. Cir. 2000))
  • finding that placement on leave without pay, which entailed, inter alia, a loss of compensation and negative consequences for employee’s eligibility for benefits, was an adverse employment action
  • stating that “harassment and hostile incidents may occur by telephone or in person during an employee’s communication with her employer while she is not working or away from the office”
  • finding that “{t]o survive' summary judgment the non-moving party must ‘produce evidence ... capable of being converted into admissible evidence’” and that “ ‘sheer hearsay[ ] ... counts for nothing* ” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Rogers, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.