Skip to main content
· 3/13/1984

Darrell R. Page v. United States

Citations

  • 729 F.2d 818
  • 234 U.S. App. D.C. 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that res judicata bars parties from relitigating “any ground for relief which they already have had an 13 opportunity to litigate—even if they chose not to exploit that opportunity—whether the initial judgment was erroneous or not” (citation omitted)
  • \knowledge acquired in 1972 that one has a claim could not trigger time limitations on allegedly tortious conduct that had not then occurred\
  • “the running of the limitations period can be tolled under the ‘continuing violation’ doctrine”
  • limitations period begins to run as of the last tortious act alleged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Robinson, Tamm, MacKinnon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.