Skip to main content
· 7/5/2013

United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n

Citations

  • 406 U.S. App. D.C. 46
  • 721 F.3d 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the denial of a motion for consolidation for “abuse of discretion”
  • “A judgment vacated either by the trial court or on appeal has no estoppel effect in a subsequent proceeding.”
  • “To evade review, the challenged action must be incapable of surviving long enough to undergo Supreme Court review.”
  • “To evade review, the challenged action must be incapable of surviving long enough to undergo Supreme Court review.”
  • “In an ordinary contract dispute, the uniqueness of those terms might make the case so ‘highly fact-specific’ that it would not likely recur.”
  • given that “the parties have already arbitrated three jurisdictional disputes arising under the [project labor agreement] . . . it is not unreasonable to expect another dispute to arise . . . before the [a]greement expires”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.