Gibson v. Klinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding petitioner’s alleged ignorance of AEDPA’s statute of limitations is insufficient to warrant equitable tolling
• holding that despite state rules that allow a petitioner to file an appeal out of time, a petitioner’s state post-conviction relief was not “pending” until the petitioner complied with those state procedures to seek an appeal
• holding that despite state rules that allow a petitioner to file an appeal out of time, a petitioner’s state post-conviction relief was not- “pending” until the petitioner complied with those state procedures to seek an appeal
• stating that a State habeas proceeding remains “pending,” and the federal habeas limitation period is tolled, through the expiration of the State appeal period
• holding petitioner’s alleged ignorance of AEDPA’s limitations period is insufficient to warrant equitable tolling
• explaining when an application for postconviction relief is “pending” for purposes of statutory tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).