Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/16/2026
Simmons v. Pierce
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 152
Syllabus
The trial court had jurisdiction to enforce contempt sanctions it imposed against a nonparty prior to the dismissal of the underlying action. The court did not abuse its discretion by imposing additional sanctions in the dismissal order that related to the original contempt.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 956×
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 201×
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 178×
- City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court· 1973-07-18· cited 159×
- Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-05· cited 18×
- Dudley v. DudleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-11· cited 6×
- Moore v. ThorWorks Indus., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-26· cited 6×
- Angotti v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-23· cited 6×
- Washington Mut. Bank v. BeatleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-29· cited 5×
- Andrews v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-17· cited 3×
- State v. WisenerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.