Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/29/2020
Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley
Citations
- 159 N.E.3d 886
- 2020 Ohio 4658
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in concluding it lacked jurisdiction to consider appellants' civil contempt motion.
Judges: Brown, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roberts v. FarrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-03· cited 3×
- Doe v. Univ. Hosps. Health Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-26· cited 3×
- 435 Elm Invest., L.L.C. v. CBD Invest. Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-03· cited 1×
- M.E.H. v. C.K.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-18
- Simmons v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-16
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 305×
- State ex rel. Ventrone v. BirkelOhio Supreme Court· 1981-03-11· cited 292×
- State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-17· cited 216×
- State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court· 2002-07-31· cited 79×
- State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court· 1991-10-09· cited 64×
- Page v. RileyOhio Supreme Court· 1999-06-16· cited 35×
- South Euclid Fraternal Order of Police v. D'AmicoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-03-25· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Benbow v. RunyanOhio Supreme Court· 2003-08-20· cited 7×
Other cases named Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.