Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/28/2022
Andrews v. Andrews
Citations
- 197 N.E.3d 1050
- 2022 Ohio 3854
Syllabus
Appellant's first three assignments of error are barred from review by res-judicata. Appellant was not entitled to counsel at purge hearing. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing contempt sentence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 1,323×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 201×
- Liming v. DamosOhio Supreme Court· 2012-10-24· cited 92×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2013-12-20· cited 64×
- The Docks Venture, L.L.C. v. Dashing Pacific Group, Ltd. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-01· cited 50×
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-04-22· cited 20×
- Souders v. SoudersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-22· cited 7×
- Bostick v. BostickOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-06· cited 6×
- M.W. v. K.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-27· cited 4×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-17· cited 3×
- In re Estate of RiddleOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.