Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/17/2020
State v. Arnold
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3749
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed where prior civil contempt proceedings in juvenile court to coerce father's compliance with court-ordered counseling and terms of visitation did not prevent criminal prosecution for interference with custody, arising from the same incidents raised in juvenile court proceedings.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-12-30· cited 389×
- State v. LovejoyOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 216×
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 201×
- Liming v. DamosOhio Supreme Court· 2012-10-24· cited 92×
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 50×
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-14· cited 48×
- State v. ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.