Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs’ experts’ reliance on the generalized ergot alkaloid inference “raises serious questions of ‘fit’ ”
• finding clinical recommendations insignificant with respect to the general acceptance of scientific methodology
• criticizing the available epidemiological studies “does not satisfy [plaintiffs] burden of proof’
• “After careful review of the animal studies at issue in this case, the court concludes that Plaintiffs have not met the necessary standard for reliability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).