Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that differential diagnosis expert testimony of a causal connection between a prescription drug (Parlodel
• concluding that differential diagnosis expert testimony of a causal connection between a prescription drug (Parlodel
• concluding that differential diagnosis expert testimony of a causal connection between a prescription drug (Parlodel
• holding that dismissal without prejudice is appropriate where a district court lacks personal jurisdiction over a defendant
• holding that the lower court’s jurisdictional ruling, which did not address the claim’s merits, should have been dismissed without prejudice
• concluding that a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is without prejudice to refiling in an appropriate forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).