Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 7/10/1995

Cavallo v. Star Enterprise

Citations

  • 892 F. Supp. 756
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 1222
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9836
  • 1995 WL 410750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding expert testimony on causation primarily because \there is no support for this causation theory in the scientific literature\
  • excluding expert's testimony when supported only by differential diagnosis, but lacking principles and methods of toxicology
  • excluding expert’s testimony when supported only by differential diagnosis, but lacking principles and methods of toxicology
  • requiring evaluation of the particular chemicals involved and scientific literature on toxicity of those chemicals to establish causation in toxic tort cases
  • excluding expert testimony on causation primarily because “there is no support for this causation theory in the scientific literature”
  • granting summary judg- ment where expert testimony was based primarily on a temporal connection be- tween exposure to jet fuel and the plaintiff’s onset of chronic respiratory illness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Cavallo v. Star Enterprise

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.