Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. Blount, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that many courts - including the Eleventh Circuit - routinely presume that literally false advertising actually deceives consumers
• holding the parties’ products were similar because they used the marks on related products and the defendant did not object to the similarity
• “An arbitrary mark is a word or phrase that bears no relationship to the product.”
• “[I]f there are gaps in an expert witness’s qualifications or knowledge, they generally go to the weight of the witness’s testimony not its admissibility.”
• “[I]f there are gaps in an expert witness’s qualifications or knowledge, they generally go to the weight of the witness’s testimony not its admissibility.”
• “[I]f there are gaps in an expert witness’s qualifications or knowledge, they generally go to the weight of the witness’s testimony not its admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).