Skip to main content
· 9/27/1988

Carita Richardson, Infant, by S. & E. Richardson, Guardians v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Citations

  • 857 F.2d 823
  • 273 U.S. App. D.C. 32
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 1415
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13180
  • 1988 WL 98895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an expert’s declaration, full of assertion but empty of facts and reasons, will not get a case past a motion for summary judgment, for the judge must “look behind [the expert’s] ultimate conclusion ... and analyze the adequacy of its foundation.”
  • judgment proper when only one reasonable conclusion can be drawn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Robinson, Silberman, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.