Sickels v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, VA medical examiners are presumed competent
• holding that the Board is entitled to presume the competence of a VA examiner and the adequacy of his opinion
• holding that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, VA medical examiners are presumed competent
• holding that the Board is entitled to presume the competence of a VA examiner and the adequacy of their opinion
• holding that the Board is entitled to presume the competence of a VA examiner and the adequacy of their opinion
• holding that the Board is entitled to presume the competence of a VA examiner and the adequacy of their opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).