Robert E. Pearl v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff’s burden in seeking review of the 3 military’s action “is a large one” that must be met with “cogent and clearly convincing evidence”
• noting that “[a]lthough the APA [is] explicitly cited only in the portion of the Tucker Act pursuant to which this court exercises jurisdiction in bid protests, see 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).