Skip to main content
· 5/3/2013

Arnold Parks v. Shinseki

Citations

  • 716 F.3d 581
  • 2013 WL 1846570
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he first step to overcoming the presumption [of competence] is to object, even where ... the veteran is acting pro se”
  • explaining that the record, even when construed sympathetically, did not contain a suggestion “that there was anything improper with the VA’s selection of an [advanced registered nurse practitioner]”
  • \The purpose of the presumption [of regularity] is 'to eliminate the burden [on VA] to produce evidence' . . . .\
  • \The purpose of the presumption [of regularity] is 'to eliminate the burden [on VA] to produce evidence' . . . .\
  • wheth- er a veteran’s exposure to three chemical warfare agents as part of a classified project were related to his diseases
  • “VA benefits from a presumption that it has properly chosen a person who is qualified to provide a medical opinion in a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Schall, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.