· 5/3/2013
Arnold Parks v. Shinseki
Citations
- 716 F.3d 581
- 2013 WL 1846570
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[t]he first step to overcoming the presumption [of competence] is to object, even where ... the veteran is acting pro se”
- explaining that the record, even when construed sympathetically, did not contain a suggestion “that there was anything improper with the VA’s selection of an [advanced registered nurse practitioner]”
- \The purpose of the presumption [of regularity] is 'to eliminate the burden [on VA] to produce evidence' . . . .\
- \The purpose of the presumption [of regularity] is 'to eliminate the burden [on VA] to produce evidence' . . . .\
- wheth- er a veteran’s exposure to three chemical warfare agents as part of a classified project were related to his diseases
- “VA benefits from a presumption that it has properly chosen a person who is qualified to provide a medical opinion in a particular case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Schall, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.